Will Giron

US State Department Approves the Keystone XL Pipeline

by , 08/29/11
filed under: Architecture

keystone XL pipeline, Keystone XL pipeline approved, transcanada, transcanada keystone XL pipeline, keystone XL pipeline unsafe, keystone pipeline affects, big oil, big oil USA, greenhouse gases,

The final approval for the $7 billion oil project will come after public hearings and consultation with other federal agencies. This could very well take a year for construction to begin, but the State Department has already made it perfectly clear that the administration will proceed with the pipelines, which are scheduled to be completed by 2013, assuming there are no delays.

TransCanada insists that the pipeline will be the safest in North America, despite critical assessments of its sturdiness in light of high pressure flow, due to the half-inch thick pipe wall in the pipeline. TransCanada, however, has agreed to “57 conditions set by the Department of Transportation last spring, including burying the pipeline four feet below the surface, committing to frequent aerial and ground monitoring and setting the maximum distance between shut-off valves at 20 miles.”

“We believe we are building the safest pipeline in North America,” said Terry Cunha – TransCanada spokesman – to the New York Times.

Gary Doer, Canadian ambassador to the United States, has also said to the New York Times that building the pipeline would create 20,000 construction jobs and 100,000 additional “indirect jobs in services and supplies.”

“It’s good for the U.S. economy, U.S. jobs and U.S. energy security,” he said. “If you ask Americans, would you choose Canada over the Middle East, they’d say yes.” Doer has also stated that the carbon emissions from oil sands production have now declined to 40 percent per barrel compared to the 90′s, and other improvement are already on their way to being implemented.

The reassurances haven’t convinced environmental activists at all, and the pipeline has created a huge division between the Obama administration and the green movement. To many, the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline is yet another disappointment, especially after a recent decision by the administration to “tentatively approve drilling in the Arctic Ocean, to open 20 million more acres of the Gulf of Mexico for oil leasing and delay several major air quality regulations.”

Michael Brune, president of the Sierra Club, urged President Obama to veto the project and issued a clear warning about the possible backlash this could have on the president:

The decision-making authority is solely the president’s. Keystone XL is a huge issue for our young leaders at the Sierra Club, but they’re also watching the president’s actions on other critically important environmental and public health protections. It will be increasingly difficult to mobilize the environmental base and to mobilize in particular young people to volunteer, to knock on thousands of doors, to put in 16-hour days, to donate money if they don’t think the president is showing the courage to stand up to big polluters.

It really is quite a disappointing on the administration’s part. Instead of investing in a new pipeline, more focus should be on green projects and alternative forms of energy. Not only would that have a positive effect on the environment, but it would also free the US of dependance on foreign oil – including oil imported from Canada! But it looks like corporate greed might have the edge on this one. Environmentalists will just have to wait and see what the final decision will be.

Via The New York Times

Related Posts

LEAVE A COMMENT

or your inhabitat account below

Let's make sure you're a real person:


3 Comments

  1. Camper6 January 5, 2012 at 7:56 pm

    Boy are a lot of people misinformed on the pipeline.

    They think that this is something new.

    The U.S. has been importing Canadian Oil for decades and using an existing Trans Canada pipeline that has just recently been completed. This is an extension to the current pipeline and will connect with it.

    As far as the tar sands or oil sands in Alberta is concerned the pipeline will also carry oil from the Bakken fields in North Dakota. It’s the same type of mining operation as the one in Alberta from oil sands.

  2. Bathroom Taps August 30, 2011 at 6:10 am

    What an absolute eye sore!!!

  3. tazguy1 August 29, 2011 at 2:18 pm

    Makes me ashamed to be Canadian and relieved I have no children to deal with this mess down the road. Though, I’m sure their future gas masks will come with an iphone-12 holder.

  • Read Inhabitat

  • Search Categories

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • Browse by Keyword

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >