Gallery: The World’s 6 Most Pressing Environmental Issues


Power Plant Image from Shutterstock


In the US alone we've made the Gulf of Mexico toxic with oil, we've caused earthquakes in the midwest while fracking for natural gas, and we've blasted through mountains in Virginia looking for coal. In the course of turning non-renewable resources into energy we're releasing all manner of toxic gases into the atmosphere, driving climate change and creating a hazardous environment for all living beings.

The fact that we're destroying the planet for a short term quick-fix of energy resources that will run out is a pretty good reason to give pause and change course. Yet massive corporations wielding immense political strength continue to drive increased, fundamentally experimental and ill-regulated fossil fuel sourcing missions. Deepwater drilling off the Cuban coast, anyone?

Steps to regulate drilling, fracking, mining and their ozone depleting emissions are certainly a great thing, but it's time, if not well past the time, that we move wholeheartedly into renewable resources. This year has seen incredible progress in both policy, innovation and adoption of renewable resources, largely solar and wind power. But there's still a long long way to go. The Great Lakes of the US and Canada have the potential to provide power for 210,000,000 homes, and as the US seeks to expedite the approval process for wind farms, we still have to design better turbines to adequately protect wildlife.

There's a lot we can still do on an individual level to reduce our energy usage, and corresponding responsibility for fossil fuel usage and the generated emissions. Simply switching to LED lightbulbs can cut energy usage of lighting a home by a third. It might not sound like much, but — as with so many easy, individually adopted earth-saving measures — when replicated across a large area is starts to make a very significant impact. Plus, the bulbs are getting cheaper!

Read the rest of this entry »


or your inhabitat account below


  1. Peggy Tiner April 22, 2014 at 10:08 pm

    I really think Dan Brown had the right idea. The population density will be reduced eventually.

  2. mmlohr20 March 26, 2014 at 11:59 am

    hay guys i like hugs zippers and also buttons and bunny\’s and puppies and i am terrified of frogs because i feel like they will jump in my mouth

  3. aqeelfarooqi June 4, 2013 at 1:22 am

    we should save our environment otherwise our coming generations will never forgive us

  4. Stator April 25, 2012 at 9:15 am

    What is needed for us to live is food, water, warmth and ability to stay dry. With enough energy most of these needs can be fulfilled with various systems.

    I believe the overpopulation craze is mostly just that, craze.
    Had we humans been able to spread out over Earth more evenly and not crammed together so much, the illusion of overpopulation would vanish. The reason we cram together much is due to an overall lack of basic factors needed for even a moderately comfortable way of life; like energy, food, water & information- for all. This availability is extremely uneven. I think money lies at the bottom, once again. Try to think about how current systems work, do I not have a point?
    The energy keep us warm and dry, food in various forms is quite abundant and technologies powered by energy could produce more food.- This coincides with the 100s of latest technological headlines talking about energy sources, food, shelters and what have you.

    Yes I am aware of the bacterias in a bottle examples, I am still vary of buying this overpopulation hype, it mildly angers me. Are you scared fellow brothers and sisters?

    If the concern is so great then here is one thing that must go; the monopoly power of elitist power companies. It has got to be the largest industry of them all, with unused potential of contributing to systems for global sustainable life on Our Planet.

    Don’t nobody dare talking about us being too many before trying to fix the broken system we call our way of life.

  5. Over April 24, 2012 at 4:10 am

    Overpopulation, ey?

  6. Prem Das April 21, 2012 at 5:00 am

    All this piecemeal approach to Global enviromental concerns is not even postponing the inevitable.

    We need to let go at least two to three billion of the earth’s human population. That is not going to happen.

    Even as we speak that are scientific initiatives thats looking to extend the life span, find more ways of impregnating women, remove natural avenues of attaining peace and quite(death)and finding cures for diseases that now kill.

    If you believe in an Ultimate being, this is He giving us enough rope to hang overselves.

  7. Nelson666 April 20, 2012 at 2:38 pm

    I am a little disappointed that the author did not have the courage to mention overpopulation, but it has a heavy hand in making all the problem he listed much worse if not being the cause of the problem in the first place.

get the free Inhabitat newsletter

Submit this form
popular today
all time
most commented
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
more popular stories >
Federated Media Publishing - Home